<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Democratic National Committee:Mainline Protestant Community</title>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>



<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=4.01</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 


<item>
<title>Hey, Pollsters: Democrats Care About Religion, Too</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Leah Daughtry, DNC Chief of Staff and Convention CEO speaks out against the biased exit polling used in the primary season so far. She calls for media and pollsters to pay closer attention to  the vital dynamic between people of Faith and the Democratic Party this election in her <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/25/AR2008012502520.html">op-ed piece</a> in the </em>Washington Post<em>.</em></p>

<blockquote><p>Religion will play an important role in today's South Carolina Democratic primary, just as it did in last week's South Carolina Republican primary. The difference is that we'll learn less about how religion affects today's vote than we learned about how it influenced last week's contest.</p>

<p>Last week, thanks to <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/index.html#SCREP">exit polls</a>, we understood the religious breakdown, how often voters attended religious services, whether they considered themselves born-again or evangelical Christians, whether they said the candidates' religious beliefs mattered and what they thought about abortion. And the polls helped to shape the news coverage, so we saw headlines such as: "<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/Vote2008/story?id=4159714">Evangelical Republicans Drive S.C. Primary</a>" and "<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080120/ap_on_el_pr/campaign_exit_poll_14">Ideology, Religion Important in S.C.</a>"</p>

<p>If previous exit polls this cycle are any indicator, religion will be much less central to the exit polls today. At most, Democrats have been asked which religion they identify with and how often they go to church. In <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/index.html#IADEM">Iowa</a> and <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/index.html#MIDEM">Michigan</a>, Democrats weren't asked about religion at all. And that, in turn, has shaped the news coverage, making it appear that one party has a monopoly on religion in this race.</p>

<p>I'm chief of staff of the Democratic National Committee and CEO of the 2008 Democratic Convention. I'm also an ordained Pentecostal minister. So I've been encouraged by the growing attention paid to the role of religion in politics as we go about the important task of electing our next president. I've been disappointed, however, with the focus of the discussion so far.</p>

<p>Democrats have been, are and will continue to be people of faith. My own support for the party stems from my sense that it is most emblematic of gospel values. Democrats believe in equal opportunity for all Americans, that no child should go to bed hungry or go without health care, that we should be good stewards of the earth, that we shouldn't pass on debt to our children, and that people who work hard should be able to earn a living wage so they can support their families.</p>

<p>As a "big tent" party, we embrace and represent people from a number of faith traditions. The religious diversity of our party reflects the rich religious diversity of our nation -- and this includes those who don't identify with a religious tradition.</p>

<p>But, for too long, we allowed the other side to define us and our values. Some Democrats were reluctant to talk about faith on the campaign trail. While strong, our faith was a personal, not partisan, matter.</p>

<p>Following the 2004 election, it became clear that Republicans used religion to create a divide. And, as people of faith and as Democrats, we had a responsibility to speak out. That's what we're doing now.
The DNC has been actively engaging people of faith who share the core values and principles of the Democratic Party. We've assembled a team of religious leaders -- including pastors, theologians and organizational leaders -- to open a dialogue and build coalitions around our shared values. And America has seen the Democratic presidential candidates sharing their own faith journeys, talking about how faith informs their politics.</p>

<p>We know the support is there -- and growing. In fact, Democrats narrowed the Republican advantage among weekly churchgoers in the 2006 election, and a <a href="http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=250">recent Pew survey</a> found that the number of young evangelicals who identified themselves as Republican dropped by 15 percentage points, from 55 percent in 2001 to 40 percent today.</p>

<p>Yet the exit polls and the media reports and the pundits have largely missed this story. They often fail to acknowledge that people of faith are and can be Democrats.</p>

<p>To be sure, exit-poll questions asking Republicans if they are born-again or evangelical Christians may be trying to approximate questions in years past about identification with the "Religious Right." But this is an outdated script that leaves the impression that religion and faith matter only to Republicans.</p>

<p>Religion will continue to play a prominent role in the Democratic nominating process as well. And pollsters and pundits and all the media would do well to examine this interesting and important dynamic.</p>

<p><em>The writer is chief of staff of the Democratic Party and CEO of the <a href="http://www.demconvention.com/">Democratic Convention</a> in Denver.</em></p></blockquote> ]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.orghttp://www.democrats.org/a/2008/01/hey_pollsters_d.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2008/01/hey_pollsters_d.php</guid>
<category>Faith in Action</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Letter from Evangelical Leaders to Polling and Political Directors of Media Outlets Represented in the National Election Pool</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The following is a letter from prominent evangelical leaders to the political and/or polling directors at the major news networks and wire services on polling practices published on the <a href="http://www.faithinpubliclife.org/content/press/2008/01/evangelicals_to_networks_stop.html">Faith in Public Life</a> website.</p>

<blockquote><p>Dear Polling or Political Director:</p>

<p>Religion is playing an unprecedented role in the 2008 presidential campaign; the need for accurate and thorough information about religious voters is difficult to overstate. Thus far, the National Election Pool's exit poll surveys have pigeonholed evangelicals, reinforcing the false stereotype that we are beholden to one political party.</p>

<p>Your entrance and exit polls at the Iowa caucuses asked Republican caucus-goers if they were "born-again or evangelical Christian(s)," but did not ask the same question of Democrats. This omission left a substantive hole in subsequent news coverage of the caucuses. Based on your polling, the public helpfully learned that born-again or evangelical Christians played a central role in Mike Huckabee's victory, but received no information about the impact of evangelical voters in the Democratic race.</p>

<p>As reported by numerous news organizations, candidates of both parties spoke explicitly of their religious faith while campaigning in Iowa and have robust faith outreach operations. By omitting the question of evangelical/born-again identification from the Democratic polls, you prevented the public from seeing the full picture of how the bipartisan courtship of evangelical voters affected the outcome of the first contest of the 2008 campaign and perpetuated the mis perception that all evangelical Christians are Republicans.</p>

<p>No party can own any faith. Evangelicals have broadened their agenda to include care for the planet, the poor and the stranger, and as a result are increasingly diverse politically.</p>

<p>Your New Hampshire exit polls gathered much more detailed information about voters' religion but still asked only Republican voters if they were evangelical or born-again. The data revealed a significant difference between the voting patterns of Republican evangelicals in Iowa and New Hampshire. In Iowa, Mike Huckabee dominated, claiming 46 percent of evangelicals' support, with no other candidate receiving even 20 percent. In New Hampshire McCain, Romney and Huckabee split the evangelical vote almost evenly. The disparity of these results suggests that evangelical voters' behavior may not conform to expectations, which further shows the need to measure it in both parties.</p>

<p>With voters entering polling sites in Michigan, Nevada and South Carolina in the coming days and weeks and Super Tuesday following
shortly thereafter, it is imperative for you to remedy the imbalance in your exit polling immediately. Evangelicalism is not a monolithic movement that fits neatly into one party. For the sake of accuracy and dispelling shopworn stereotypes, we urge you to allow all evangelicals an opportunity to be represented in your surveys and polling data.</p>

<p>Dr. Joel Hunter, Senior Pastor, Northland A Church Distributed</p>

<p>David Neff, Editor, Christianity Today</p>

<p>Rev. Jim Wallis, Founder, Sojourners</p>

<p>Randy Brinson, Founder, Redeem the Vote</p>

<p>Paul Corts, President, Council for Christian Colleges and Universities</p>

<p>Dr. David P. Gushee, Distinguished university professor of Christian ethics at Mercer University</p>

<p>Brian McLaren, Author, Founding pastor of Cedar Ridge Community Church</p>

<p>Randall Balmer, Professor of American religious history at Barnard College, Columbia University</p>

<p>Glen Stassen, Lewis B. Smedes Professor of Christian Ethics at Fuller Theological Seminary</p>

<p><em>*Institutional affiliations are given for identification purposes only.</em></p></blockquote>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.orghttp://www.democrats.org/a/2008/01/letter_from_eva.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2008/01/letter_from_eva.php</guid>
<category>Faith in Action</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:40:23 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Church: Moving Into A Dorm Near You</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As growing trend arising out of the University of California at Berkeley, some dormitories are now offering a <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/24/BAG32KNVMF1.DTL">spiritual connection</a> to the residents on college campuses.  At UC Berkeley, the Presbyterian Church renovated the campus ministry building, offering 125 students not only a dorm room, but also bible study, theology classes, and social justice projects.   <blockquote>The movement has been fueled by a rising interest in religion and spirituality among college students and a push by campus ministries to find new sources of revenue to support their programs and to attract more students. </blockquote> Rev. Randy Bare is the architect behind the Berkeley project and has started a part time consulting business working exclusively on housing projects with non profit ministries and local churches in the area of college campuses.  Although the housing projects may be sponsored by outside organizations, they still follow all rules, regulations, and levels of supervision as other campus housing facilities.   <br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.orghttp://www.democrats.org/a/2006/08/church_moving_i.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/08/church_moving_i.php</guid>
<category>Young People and Students</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:57:55 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Mainline Protestant Community and the Democratic Party</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Justice and equality for all are moral priorities and the Democratic Party and Mainline Churches have worked side by side for centuries to ensure these rights. Amidst the diversity of the Mainline Churches are vitally important shared values and a proud history that unite the community and the Democratic Party to this day. </p>

<p>Together, the Democratic Party and Mainline Protestants are working to:</p>

<ul><li>Eliminate <a href="http://www.democrats.org/a/2007/06/dnc_endorses_on.php">extreme poverty</a> and support the working poor.</li>
<li>Ensure healthcare is available <a href="http://www.democrats.org/a/2007/08/dean_bush_repub.php">to every child</a>.</li>
<li>Take immediate and deliberate actions to end the horrific and sweeping <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=UxSD1SDQY1I">genocide in Darfur</a>.</li>
<li>Chart a new and responsible course from the President’s failed <a href="http://www.democrats.org/a/2007/07/dean_we_need_to_1.php">policy in Iraq</a>.</li></ul>

<p><a href="http://www.democrats.org/page/content/FIASignup">Join us today</a> to stay informed on issues that matter to the Mainline Protestant community and check out the ways you can get involved in <a href="http://www.democrats.org/page/group/MainlineProtestantCommunity">your community on PartyBuilder</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.orghttp://www.democrats.org/a/2005/08/the_mainline_pr.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/08/the_mainline_pr.php</guid>
<category>Mainline Protestant Community</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:38:10 -0500</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>